Restrictions on parliamentary video use

Restrictions on parliamentary video use, particularly a restriction on parliamentary coverage being used in the context of light entertainment, are generally respected by UK broadcasters.

Since 1989, when cameras were permitted into the Houses of Parliament, broadcasters have had to agree to licensing conditions[1] that have restricted use, such as:

a) no extracts of Parliamentary proceedings may be used in any light entertainment programme or in a programme of political satire;

Effects and criticism

In 2011, an edition of US satire show The Daily Show was not broadcast[2] by Channel 4 as a result of the licensing restrictions.

In 2016 a question was raised by Rupa Huq[3] on behalf of Charlie Brooker[4][5] on the matter of revisiting the restrictions.

When Last Week Tonight used parliamentary footage in December 2018[6] they replaced it in the UK broadcast[7].

It was raised in parliament again[8] in June 2019 by Nigel Huddleston MP.

Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 exceptions

As noted by ORG at the time[9] section 30A of The Copyright and Rights in Performances (Quotation and Parody) Regulations 2014, updating the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988, was introduced to allow an exception to copyright for satire and parody (as allowed by the Infosec Directive (2001/29) ). Since there are no exceptions in the law for parliamentary footage, this would override the stated licensing terms.

(1) Fair dealing with a work for the purposes of caricature, parody or pastiche does not infringe copyright in the work.

Links

References